Multicultural Communities: Definition and Characteristics
Multicultural Communities: Definition, Characteristics, Characteristics, Causes, and Examples - The term Multiculturalism has recently begun to be discussed in various circles regarding the outbreak of ethnic conflict in the country. Multiculturalism owned by Indonesia is considered a major factor in the occurrence of conflict.
Conflicts related to SARA, namely ethnicity, religion, race, and intergroup relations that occur in Aceh, Ambon, Papua, Kupang, Maluku and various other regions, are realities that can threaten national integration on the one hand and require concrete solutions for resolution on the other. Until the concept of multiculturalism emerged. Multiculturalism is used as the main reference for the formation of a peaceful multicultural society.
Multicultural Society
Understanding Multicultural Communities According to Experts
According to C.W. Watson (1998) in his book Multiculturalism
to talk about multicultural societies is to talk about the people of a country, nation, region, even a limited geographical location such as a city or school, which consists of people who have different cultures in equality.
J. S. Furnivall
Multicultural society: a society consisting of two or more communities (groups) that are culturally and economically fragmented and have institutional structures that differ from one another.
Based on the configuration (composition) and the ethnic community plural society is distinguished:
Compound society with balanced composition
Consists of a number of communities or ethnic groups that have more or less balanced competitive strengths. Inter-ethnic coalition is needed so that the community becomes stable
Compound society with a dominant majority
Consists of a number of ethnic communities with unbalanced competitive forces.
Majority ethnic groups dominate political and economic competition
Compound society with a dominant minority
Minority ethnic groups have broad competitive advantages that dominate the political and economic life of society
Compound society with fragmentation
Consists of a number of ethnic groups but all of them are in small numbers so that no single group has a dominant political or economic position Usually it is very stable even though it still holds the potential for conflict due to the low ability of coalition building.
Nasikun
Compound society: a society that adheres to a variety of value systems embraced by various social units that are its parts is such that members of the community lack loyalty to society as a whole, lack cultural homogeneity, and even lack the bases for mutual understanding of one to each other.
Pierre L. Van Den Berghe
Characteristics of multilultural societies:
There is segmentation into different forms of sub-cultural groups
Having a social structure that is divided into institutions that are noncomplementary
Lack of developing consensus among its members on basic values
Relatively often experience conflict between one group with another group
Relatively, social integration grows on coercion and interdependence in the economic field
The political dominance of one group over other groups
Clliford Geertz
Calling a multicultural society with a pluralistic society is marked by primordial ties which are interpreted as a culture of imaging or marking given (given). Each individual or group has a different character from other individuals or groups.
5 images created by the community but considered as God's gift:
Race
Language
Regional / geographical area
It is the basis for economic and political structures that are considered basic units in the life of ethnic groups and nations.
Religion
Culture
Includes language, religion, and social organization
Characteristics of Multicultural Communities
Having more than one cultural structure
Basic values that are mutually agreed are difficult to develop.
social conflicts often occur that smell SARA.
its social structure is more non-complementary in nature.
the integration process that occurs is slow.
economic, political and socio-cultural dominance often occurs.
In another sense, multicultural societies appear to live together despite different races, religions, and ethnicities (segmented), but in their daily lives they often prefer to be friends or associate with people from their areas because they are considered easier to communicate, have an inner bond the same, and have a lot in common.
Characteristics of Multicultural Communities
Pierre L. Va den Berghe, a leading sociologist, explains the characteristics of multicultural societies and predicts the consequences of daily life as follows:
There is segmentation into distinct sub-cultural groups (Primordial). Multicultural societies that are segmented in different sub-cultural groups are societies that are divided into small groups based on race, ethnicity, each religion and in association separately because individuals prefer to interact with people of one tribe, race, or religion alone.
Laraphgirl Journals is Education Blog Info and Sharing Scientific Journal for All Peoples
Kinds of Human Rights
Kinds of Human Rights (Human Rights)
a. Personal Rights (Perseonal Rights)
b. Economic Rights (Property Rights)
c. Political Rights
d. Rights of Legal Equality
e. Social and Culture Rights
f. Judicial Rights (Procedural Rights)
The explanation
There are various or also types of Human Rights (Ham), including the following:
a. Personal Rights (Perseonal Rights)
Personal rights are rights which include a freedom to express opinions, freedom to embrace religion, freedom to be able to move, freedom to be active in any organization or association, and so on.
For example :
The right to freedom in expressing or delivering or also expressing an opinion.
The right to freedom in carrying out a belief and also embracing a religion.
Kebabasan rights in traveling, visiting, and also moving places.
Customary Rights in choosing or determining an organization and also active in the organization.
b. Economic Rights (Property Rights)
Economic Human Rights is the right to be able to own, buy and sell, and also use something.
For example :
Human Rights regarding the freedom to be able to buy.
Human rights regarding freedom to enter into and also enter into contract agreements
Human rights regarding freedom to own something
Human rights regarding freedom to have a decent job.
Human rights regarding freedom to conduct transactions
Economic Rights in the world of work
c. Political Rights
Political Rights are the right to participate in government, the right to vote means the right to be elected and to choose, for example:
Human Rights to nominate as a leader of an area and so on
The right to be able to vote in an election
Human Rights to be able to establish political parties, and so on.
Human Rights regarding freedom to participate in government activities |
Political Rights in providing proposals or opinions in the form of petition proposals.
d. Rights of Legal Equality
Human Rights Law is the right to get an equal treatment in law and also government.
For example :
Rights in getting a service and also legal protection
Human rights in obtaining and also having legal defense in a court of law.
The same human rights in the legal process
Human Rights are treated equally or equally in law
e. Social and Culture Rights
Social and Cultural Rights are the rights that are involved in the community, namely to be able to have education, the right to be able to develop culture and so on.
Example :
Human Rights to determine education
Human Rights to be able to develop talents and interests
Human Rights to be able to develop Hobbies
Human Rights to be creative
f. Judicial Rights (Procedural Rights)
Judicial Rights are the right to get a judicial procedure and also protection (procedural rights), for example are regulations in terms of a detention, arrest and also search.
For example :
Human Rights get a fair treatment in law
Human Rights get a defense in law
The right to get the same thing in the process of a legal process both regarding investigation, search, arrest, and also detention.
Human Rights Characteristics
Cannot be revoked, meaning that human rights cannot be eliminated or handed over.
Cannot be shared, meaning that everyone has the right to all rights, whether civil and political rights or economic, social and cultural rights.
Essential, meaning that human rights are the human rights of all human beings who have existed since birth.
Universal, meaning that human rights apply to all people regardless of status, ethnicity, gender, or other differences. Equality is one of the basic human rights ideas.
a. Personal Rights (Perseonal Rights)
b. Economic Rights (Property Rights)
c. Political Rights
d. Rights of Legal Equality
e. Social and Culture Rights
f. Judicial Rights (Procedural Rights)
The explanation
There are various or also types of Human Rights (Ham), including the following:
a. Personal Rights (Perseonal Rights)
Personal rights are rights which include a freedom to express opinions, freedom to embrace religion, freedom to be able to move, freedom to be active in any organization or association, and so on.
For example :
The right to freedom in expressing or delivering or also expressing an opinion.
The right to freedom in carrying out a belief and also embracing a religion.
Kebabasan rights in traveling, visiting, and also moving places.
Customary Rights in choosing or determining an organization and also active in the organization.
b. Economic Rights (Property Rights)
Economic Human Rights is the right to be able to own, buy and sell, and also use something.
For example :
Human Rights regarding the freedom to be able to buy.
Human rights regarding freedom to enter into and also enter into contract agreements
Human rights regarding freedom to own something
Human rights regarding freedom to have a decent job.
Human rights regarding freedom to conduct transactions
Economic Rights in the world of work
c. Political Rights
Political Rights are the right to participate in government, the right to vote means the right to be elected and to choose, for example:
Human Rights to nominate as a leader of an area and so on
The right to be able to vote in an election
Human Rights to be able to establish political parties, and so on.
Human Rights regarding freedom to participate in government activities |
Political Rights in providing proposals or opinions in the form of petition proposals.
d. Rights of Legal Equality
Human Rights Law is the right to get an equal treatment in law and also government.
For example :
Rights in getting a service and also legal protection
Human rights in obtaining and also having legal defense in a court of law.
The same human rights in the legal process
Human Rights are treated equally or equally in law
e. Social and Culture Rights
Social and Cultural Rights are the rights that are involved in the community, namely to be able to have education, the right to be able to develop culture and so on.
Example :
Human Rights to determine education
Human Rights to be able to develop talents and interests
Human Rights to be able to develop Hobbies
Human Rights to be creative
f. Judicial Rights (Procedural Rights)
Judicial Rights are the right to get a judicial procedure and also protection (procedural rights), for example are regulations in terms of a detention, arrest and also search.
For example :
Human Rights get a fair treatment in law
Human Rights get a defense in law
The right to get the same thing in the process of a legal process both regarding investigation, search, arrest, and also detention.
Human Rights Characteristics
Cannot be revoked, meaning that human rights cannot be eliminated or handed over.
Cannot be shared, meaning that everyone has the right to all rights, whether civil and political rights or economic, social and cultural rights.
Essential, meaning that human rights are the human rights of all human beings who have existed since birth.
Universal, meaning that human rights apply to all people regardless of status, ethnicity, gender, or other differences. Equality is one of the basic human rights ideas.
Understanding Human Rights According to Experts
Understanding Human Rights According to Experts
The understanding according to several experts including:
1. According to Kevin Boyle and David Beetham
Human rights and fundamental freedoms are individual rights that stem from human needs and capacities.
2. According to Miriam Budiarjo
Human rights are rights possessed by every person who is brought from birth to the world, the rights are universal because they are owned without differences in gender, race, culture, ethnicity, religion and so on.
3. According to Oemar Seno Adji
Human rights are rights inherent in every human dignity as a human being from the creation of God Almighty whose nature must not be violated by anyone "other human beings / groups".
4. According to Prof. Koentjoro Poerbopranoto
Human rights are rights that are fundamental or fundamental, rights possessed by every human being based on their nature which basically cannot be separated so that it is sacred.
5. According to Law No. 39 of 1999
Human rights are a set of rights inherent in human beings as creatures of God Almighty, where those rights are gifts that must be protected and respected by every human in order to protect the dignity and dignity of every human being.
6. According to G.J Wolhos
Human rights are a number of rights that have been embedded and rooted in every human being in the world and these rights must not be eliminated, because eliminating other people's human rights is the same as eliminating the degree of humanity.
7. According to C. de Rover
Human rights are the same legal rights to every human being whether rich or poor, male or female. Even though their rights have been violated, their human rights cannot be denied. Human rights are laws that must be protected from national rules so that all are fulfilled so that human rights can be upheld, upheld and protected.
8. According to Leah Kevin
According to him the conception of human rights has two basic meanings, namely:
The first is that basic and inseparable rights belong to a person simply because he is a human being. Those rights are moral rights which come from their existence as human beings from every human being. The second of human rights is legal rights, both internationally and nationally.
9. According to Miriam Budiardjo
Miriam Budiardjo limits the understanding of human rights as rights that humans have acquired and brought along with their birth or presence in society.
10. According to (Kaelan: 2002)
Human rights are basic rights possessed by humans, in accordance with their nature
11. In the opinion of Jan Materson (from the UN human rights commission)
in Teaching Human Rights, the United Nations as quoted by Baharuddin Lopa emphasized that human rights are rights inherent in every human being, without which it is impossible for humans to live as humans.
12. According to Prof. Mr. Koentjoro Peorbapranoto
Human Rights: rights that are human in nature, meaning that rights possessed by humans are devoted to their nature and cannot be separated from their nature, so they are sacred.
13. According to Law No. 26 of 2000 concerning Human Rights Courts
Human Rights: a set of rights inherent in human nature and human existence as creatures created by God and is a gift that must be respected, upheld and protected by the state, law, government and everyone for the honor and protection of human dignity.
14. According to Wikipedia
Ham are the rights that a person has had since they were in the womb.
15. According to the KBBI
Ham is an internationally protected right "namely the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights" such as the right to life, the right to independence, the right to own, the right to express opinions.
Also Read Articles That May Be Associated: International Relations: Understanding, Purpose, Principles, And Patterns and Their Features in Complete
16. According to Muladi
Human Rights Are all basic rights or basic inherent in humans in their lives.
17. According to Haar Tilar
Human rights are rights inherent in every human being and without having these rights, every human being cannot live like a human. This right was obtained from birth into the world.
18. According to Austin-Ranney
Human rights are freedom spaces for every individual which are formulated in detail and clearly in the constitution and have been guaranteed by the government.
19. According to Karel Vasak
Human rights are classified from three generations inspired by three themes in the French Revolution, namely the first generation: "Liberte" Political and Civil Rights, the second generation, "Egalite" Social, Economic and Cultural Rights and the Third Generation, "Fraternite" Solidarity.
The three generations need to be understood as one, complementary and interrelated. Vasak uses the term "generation" to refer to the scope and substance of rights which are prioritized over a period of time.
20. According to Jack Donney
Human rights are rights possessed by humans solely because he is a human. Humanity has it not because it is given to it by society or refers to positive law, but it is based on the existence of dignity as a human being and that right is a gift from God.
21. According to Mahfudz M.D
Human rights are rights inherent in the dignity of every human being where those rights are brought from birth to the world so that the rights are inherently natural.
22. According to A.J.M Milne
Human rights is a right that has been owned by all human beings in the world, in all periods, and also in all places because the priority of its existence is as a human being.
23. According to SHAW
Human rights is that if the public discourse of the global community in a peaceful period can be said to have a common moral language, it is a human right. Despite this strong claim was made by the existence of human rights doctrine in order to continue to bring up attitude
debate and skepticism about the nature, content and justification of human rights to the present day. Indeed the question of what is meant by "rights" has controversy and is still a continuing philosophical debate.
24. According to John Locke
Human rights are rights directly given by God to humans as natural rights. Therefore there is no power in the world that can uproot it. Human rights are fundamental "fundamental" to human life and in essence are very sacred.
25. According to Peter R. Baehr
Human rights are absolute basic rights and must be owned by every human being for their development.
26. According to Franz Magnis Suseno
Human rights are rights that are already possessed by every human being and not because they are obtained from "other human" societies, not because of positive laws that apply, but for their dignity as a human being, humans have human rights because they are human beings.
27. According to Komnas HAM
Human rights cover all fields of human life whether political, economic, civil, social and cultural. The five cannot be separated from each other. Political and civil rights have no meaning if the people still have to struggle with suffering and poverty.
But on the other hand, the problem of poverty security and other reasons, can not be used consciously to violate human rights and political and social freedom of the community. Human rights do not
support individualism, but block it by protecting individuals, groups and groups, amidst the violence of modern life. Human rights are a sign of real solidarity of a nation with weak citizens.
28. According to Thomas Jefferson
Human Rights Are Human Freedom Not Given By The State. This Freedom Comes From God That Is Cling To The Existence Of Individual Humans.
29. According to Rhoda E. Howard
Human Rights or Human Rights as Egilater Tool to Give Membership to All Persons in a Collective Unity.
30. According to the MPR-RI Number XVII / MPR / 1998
Human rights are basic rights inherent in human beings that are natural, universal and eternal as a gift from God Almighty that serves to ensure the survival, independence, development of human beings and society that must not be contested and ignored by anyone.
The understanding according to several experts including:
1. According to Kevin Boyle and David Beetham
Human rights and fundamental freedoms are individual rights that stem from human needs and capacities.
2. According to Miriam Budiarjo
Human rights are rights possessed by every person who is brought from birth to the world, the rights are universal because they are owned without differences in gender, race, culture, ethnicity, religion and so on.
3. According to Oemar Seno Adji
Human rights are rights inherent in every human dignity as a human being from the creation of God Almighty whose nature must not be violated by anyone "other human beings / groups".
4. According to Prof. Koentjoro Poerbopranoto
Human rights are rights that are fundamental or fundamental, rights possessed by every human being based on their nature which basically cannot be separated so that it is sacred.
5. According to Law No. 39 of 1999
Human rights are a set of rights inherent in human beings as creatures of God Almighty, where those rights are gifts that must be protected and respected by every human in order to protect the dignity and dignity of every human being.
6. According to G.J Wolhos
Human rights are a number of rights that have been embedded and rooted in every human being in the world and these rights must not be eliminated, because eliminating other people's human rights is the same as eliminating the degree of humanity.
7. According to C. de Rover
Human rights are the same legal rights to every human being whether rich or poor, male or female. Even though their rights have been violated, their human rights cannot be denied. Human rights are laws that must be protected from national rules so that all are fulfilled so that human rights can be upheld, upheld and protected.
8. According to Leah Kevin
According to him the conception of human rights has two basic meanings, namely:
The first is that basic and inseparable rights belong to a person simply because he is a human being. Those rights are moral rights which come from their existence as human beings from every human being. The second of human rights is legal rights, both internationally and nationally.
9. According to Miriam Budiardjo
Miriam Budiardjo limits the understanding of human rights as rights that humans have acquired and brought along with their birth or presence in society.
10. According to (Kaelan: 2002)
Human rights are basic rights possessed by humans, in accordance with their nature
11. In the opinion of Jan Materson (from the UN human rights commission)
in Teaching Human Rights, the United Nations as quoted by Baharuddin Lopa emphasized that human rights are rights inherent in every human being, without which it is impossible for humans to live as humans.
12. According to Prof. Mr. Koentjoro Peorbapranoto
Human Rights: rights that are human in nature, meaning that rights possessed by humans are devoted to their nature and cannot be separated from their nature, so they are sacred.
13. According to Law No. 26 of 2000 concerning Human Rights Courts
Human Rights: a set of rights inherent in human nature and human existence as creatures created by God and is a gift that must be respected, upheld and protected by the state, law, government and everyone for the honor and protection of human dignity.
14. According to Wikipedia
Ham are the rights that a person has had since they were in the womb.
15. According to the KBBI
Ham is an internationally protected right "namely the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights" such as the right to life, the right to independence, the right to own, the right to express opinions.
Also Read Articles That May Be Associated: International Relations: Understanding, Purpose, Principles, And Patterns and Their Features in Complete
16. According to Muladi
Human Rights Are all basic rights or basic inherent in humans in their lives.
17. According to Haar Tilar
Human rights are rights inherent in every human being and without having these rights, every human being cannot live like a human. This right was obtained from birth into the world.
18. According to Austin-Ranney
Human rights are freedom spaces for every individual which are formulated in detail and clearly in the constitution and have been guaranteed by the government.
19. According to Karel Vasak
Human rights are classified from three generations inspired by three themes in the French Revolution, namely the first generation: "Liberte" Political and Civil Rights, the second generation, "Egalite" Social, Economic and Cultural Rights and the Third Generation, "Fraternite" Solidarity.
The three generations need to be understood as one, complementary and interrelated. Vasak uses the term "generation" to refer to the scope and substance of rights which are prioritized over a period of time.
20. According to Jack Donney
Human rights are rights possessed by humans solely because he is a human. Humanity has it not because it is given to it by society or refers to positive law, but it is based on the existence of dignity as a human being and that right is a gift from God.
21. According to Mahfudz M.D
Human rights are rights inherent in the dignity of every human being where those rights are brought from birth to the world so that the rights are inherently natural.
22. According to A.J.M Milne
Human rights is a right that has been owned by all human beings in the world, in all periods, and also in all places because the priority of its existence is as a human being.
23. According to SHAW
Human rights is that if the public discourse of the global community in a peaceful period can be said to have a common moral language, it is a human right. Despite this strong claim was made by the existence of human rights doctrine in order to continue to bring up attitude
debate and skepticism about the nature, content and justification of human rights to the present day. Indeed the question of what is meant by "rights" has controversy and is still a continuing philosophical debate.
24. According to John Locke
Human rights are rights directly given by God to humans as natural rights. Therefore there is no power in the world that can uproot it. Human rights are fundamental "fundamental" to human life and in essence are very sacred.
25. According to Peter R. Baehr
Human rights are absolute basic rights and must be owned by every human being for their development.
26. According to Franz Magnis Suseno
Human rights are rights that are already possessed by every human being and not because they are obtained from "other human" societies, not because of positive laws that apply, but for their dignity as a human being, humans have human rights because they are human beings.
27. According to Komnas HAM
Human rights cover all fields of human life whether political, economic, civil, social and cultural. The five cannot be separated from each other. Political and civil rights have no meaning if the people still have to struggle with suffering and poverty.
But on the other hand, the problem of poverty security and other reasons, can not be used consciously to violate human rights and political and social freedom of the community. Human rights do not
support individualism, but block it by protecting individuals, groups and groups, amidst the violence of modern life. Human rights are a sign of real solidarity of a nation with weak citizens.
28. According to Thomas Jefferson
Human Rights Are Human Freedom Not Given By The State. This Freedom Comes From God That Is Cling To The Existence Of Individual Humans.
29. According to Rhoda E. Howard
Human Rights or Human Rights as Egilater Tool to Give Membership to All Persons in a Collective Unity.
30. According to the MPR-RI Number XVII / MPR / 1998
Human rights are basic rights inherent in human beings that are natural, universal and eternal as a gift from God Almighty that serves to ensure the survival, independence, development of human beings and society that must not be contested and ignored by anyone.
Understanding the Principle of Legality in Law and Its Purpose
Understanding the Principle of Legality in Law and Its Purpose
Understanding the Principle of Legality
Understanding the Principle of Legality in Criminal Law and Its Purpose - The Principle of Legality is a Guarantee for a person's freedom with a limit of what activities are prohibited clearly and precisely. The principle also protects against abuse or abuse of authority about illegal acts and penalties.
So based on this principle, no act is permitted to violate the law by a judge if it has not been clearly stated by criminal law and as long as the act has not been committed.
Likewise the actions of someone who is capable cannot be said to be prohibited, before there is a ketentyan who committed the violation, and he has the freedom to do the act or leave it, so there is someone who violates it. In a sense, criminal law cannot apply backwards to acts that do not yet have rules, therefore the criminal law must go forward.
The principle of legality has a relationship with Von Feubach's theory
Initially the principle of legality has a relationship with Von Feubach's theory, which is called the Vom Psycologischen Zwang theory. It means that in determining the prohibited actions, not only in the actions listed, but also the type of penalty imposed.
The principle of legality applies in the realm of criminal law and is famous for the legendary adageum Von Feuerbach which reads nullum delictum nulla poena sine praevia lege poenali. Freely, the adage can be interpreted as "there is no criminal offense (offense), there is no penalty without (based on) the rules that preceded it". In general, Von Feuerbach divides the adage into three parts, namely:
This principle also applies in the realm of criminal law and is well known for the legendary adage Von Feuerbach which reads nullum delictum nulla poena sine praevia lege poenali. Freely, adage can be interpreted as "there is no crime (seconds), there is no penalty without (based on) the preceding rules". In general, Von Feuerbach divides the adagium into three parts, namely:
There is no penalty, if there is no law
There is no punishment, if there is no crime
There is no crime, if there is no penalty, which is based on the Act
Adagium is the basis of the principle that criminal provisions cannot be retroactive (non-retroactive hope) because an offense can be considered a crime if there are previous rules that violate the seconds to do, not after the offense has been committed.
The Purpose of the Principle of Legality
The purpose of the legality principle is to strengthen legal certainty, as well as to create justice and honesty for the accused, to make the detention function effective in criminal prosecutions, prevent abuse of power, and to strengthen the rule of law.
The principle is indeed very effective in protecting the people from the arbitrary treatment of someone in power, but it is considered less effective for law enforcement in responding to the rapid development of crime, and is considered by some experts to be a fundamental weakness.
Definition of Human Rights
In the state agreement theory, there are Pactum Unionis and Pactum Subjectionis. Pactum unionis is an agreement between individuals to form a state, while pactum subjectionis is an agreement between individuals and the state formed. Thomas Hobbes recognizes Pactum Subjectionis and does not recognize Pactum Unionis. John Lock recognizes both Pactum Unionis and Pactum Subjectionis, while JJ Roessaeu only recognizes Pactum Unionis.
All three understand this. But basically the treaty theory mandates the existence of a protection of the rights of citizens which must be guaranteed by the authorities and the form of the guarantee must be contained in the constitution.
In relation to this matter, human rights are fundamental rights that cannot be revoked because he is a human being. The referred human rights are now a set of rights developed by the United Nations since the end of World War II. As a consequence, states cannot circumvent the protection of the human rights of non-citizens.
Understanding the Principle of Legality
Understanding the Principle of Legality in Criminal Law and Its Purpose - The Principle of Legality is a Guarantee for a person's freedom with a limit of what activities are prohibited clearly and precisely. The principle also protects against abuse or abuse of authority about illegal acts and penalties.
So based on this principle, no act is permitted to violate the law by a judge if it has not been clearly stated by criminal law and as long as the act has not been committed.
Likewise the actions of someone who is capable cannot be said to be prohibited, before there is a ketentyan who committed the violation, and he has the freedom to do the act or leave it, so there is someone who violates it. In a sense, criminal law cannot apply backwards to acts that do not yet have rules, therefore the criminal law must go forward.
The principle of legality has a relationship with Von Feubach's theory
Initially the principle of legality has a relationship with Von Feubach's theory, which is called the Vom Psycologischen Zwang theory. It means that in determining the prohibited actions, not only in the actions listed, but also the type of penalty imposed.
The principle of legality applies in the realm of criminal law and is famous for the legendary adageum Von Feuerbach which reads nullum delictum nulla poena sine praevia lege poenali. Freely, the adage can be interpreted as "there is no criminal offense (offense), there is no penalty without (based on) the rules that preceded it". In general, Von Feuerbach divides the adage into three parts, namely:
This principle also applies in the realm of criminal law and is well known for the legendary adage Von Feuerbach which reads nullum delictum nulla poena sine praevia lege poenali. Freely, adage can be interpreted as "there is no crime (seconds), there is no penalty without (based on) the preceding rules". In general, Von Feuerbach divides the adagium into three parts, namely:
There is no penalty, if there is no law
There is no punishment, if there is no crime
There is no crime, if there is no penalty, which is based on the Act
Adagium is the basis of the principle that criminal provisions cannot be retroactive (non-retroactive hope) because an offense can be considered a crime if there are previous rules that violate the seconds to do, not after the offense has been committed.
The Purpose of the Principle of Legality
The purpose of the legality principle is to strengthen legal certainty, as well as to create justice and honesty for the accused, to make the detention function effective in criminal prosecutions, prevent abuse of power, and to strengthen the rule of law.
The principle is indeed very effective in protecting the people from the arbitrary treatment of someone in power, but it is considered less effective for law enforcement in responding to the rapid development of crime, and is considered by some experts to be a fundamental weakness.
Definition of Human Rights
In the state agreement theory, there are Pactum Unionis and Pactum Subjectionis. Pactum unionis is an agreement between individuals to form a state, while pactum subjectionis is an agreement between individuals and the state formed. Thomas Hobbes recognizes Pactum Subjectionis and does not recognize Pactum Unionis. John Lock recognizes both Pactum Unionis and Pactum Subjectionis, while JJ Roessaeu only recognizes Pactum Unionis.
All three understand this. But basically the treaty theory mandates the existence of a protection of the rights of citizens which must be guaranteed by the authorities and the form of the guarantee must be contained in the constitution.
In relation to this matter, human rights are fundamental rights that cannot be revoked because he is a human being. The referred human rights are now a set of rights developed by the United Nations since the end of World War II. As a consequence, states cannot circumvent the protection of the human rights of non-citizens.
How to be Published in International Journals?
How to be published in international journals
How to be published in international journals
Journal editors share their suggestions on how to organize a journal, write a cover letter - and handle awkward feedback from reviewers
Writing for international journals is very competitive. Even if you overcome the first obstacle and come up with a valuable idea or research work - how do you then summarize it in a way that will appeal to reviewers?
There is no simple formula to publish - the expectations of editors can vary between and within the field of study. But there are some challenges that all academic writers will face regardless of their discipline. How should you respond to reviewers' feedback? Is there a correct way to arrange paper? And should you always bother to revise and submit again? We ask journal editors from various backgrounds for their tips to be published.
Writing phase
1) Focus on stories that develop logically, not chronologically
Take time before you even write your journal to think about the logic of the presentation. When writing, focus on the story that develops logically, rather than the chronological order of the experiments that you conduct.
2) Don't try to write and edit simultaneously
Open the file on a PC and enter all of your posts and sub-posts and then fill in one of the posts where you have the idea to do it. If you reach your daily target (mine 500 words) write down other ideas as bullet points and stop writing; then use the points to start the next day.
If you write and can't think of the right words (for example for an elephant) don't worry - write (big long nose of an animal) and continue - come back later and get the correct terms. Write not edited; if not, you lose flow.
3) Don't bury your argument like a needle in a haystack
If someone asks you on a bus to explain your journal quickly, can you do it in clear, everyday language? This clear argument will appear in the abstract and the first paragraph (even the first line) of your journal. Don't make us chase down your argument like a needle in a haystack. If hidden on page seven it will only upset us. Oh, and make sure your argument goes along different parts of this journal and brings together theories and empirical material.
4) Ask a colleague to check your work
One of the problems faced by journal editors is poorly written journals. Maybe the first language of the writer is not English and they have not tried hard to proofread it. It might be very difficult to know what is happening in an article if the language and syntax are bad.
5) Published by writing a review or response
Writing a review is a good way to be published - especially for people who are in the early stages of their careers. This is an opportunity to practice writing a work for publication, and get a copy of the book you want for free. We publish more reviews than journals so we continue to look for reviewers (Laraphgirl Journal, 2017)
Several journals, including ours, publish replies to journals that have been published in the same journal. Editors quite like to publish replies to previous journals because it stimulates discussion.
6) Don't forget about international readers
We get people who write from America who think everyone knows the American system - and the same thing happens with British writers. Because we are an international journal, we need writers to enter that international context. You can read more about it at ZAMBRUT.Com.
7) Don't try to cram your PhD into 6,000 words
Sometimes people want to throw everything away at once and achieve many goals. We got people trying to tell us all their PhDs in 6,000 words and it didn't work. More experienced writers will write two or three journals from one project, using certain aspects of their research as a hook.
8) Choose the right journal: that's a bad sign if you don't recognize any editorial boards
Check whether your article is within the scope of the journal you are submitting. This seems very clear but it is surprising how many articles are sent to journals that are totally inappropriate. This is a bad sign if you don't recognize the names of the editorial board members. Ideally, look at a number of current issues to ensure that the article is published on the same topic and has a similar quality and impact.
9) Always follow the correct shipping procedure
Often writers don't spend the 10 minutes needed to read instructions to writers who spend a lot of time on writers and editors and extend the process when there's no need
10) Don't repeat your abstract in the cover letter.
We look to your cover letter for an indication of what you find most interesting and significant about the journal, and why you think it is suitable for the journal. There is no need to repeat the abstract or read the contents of the journal in detail - we will read the journal itself to find out what it says. The cover letter is the place for larger picture outlines, plus any other information you would like us to have.
11) A common reason for rejection is lack of context
Make sure that it is clear where your research is in a broader scientific landscape, and gaps in knowledge are handled. A common reason for articles to be rejected after peer review is lack of context or lack of clarity about why this research is important.
12) Don't mention your methodology too much
Ethnography seems to be a trendy method nowadays, so many articles submitted claim based on that. However, a closer examination revealed very limited and standard interview data. Some interviews in cafes are not ethnographic. Be clear - right from the start - about the nature and scope of your data collection. The same applies to the use of theory. If theoretical insights are useful for your analysis, use them consistently throughout your argument and text.
13) Respond directly (and calmly) to reviewer comments
When resubmitting the journal after a revision, include a detailed document that summarizes all the changes suggested by reviewers, and how you have changed your paper from that perspective. Stick to the facts, and don't shout. Don't respond to reviewers' feedback as soon as you get it. Read it, think about a few days, discuss with others, and then make a response.
14) Revise and submit your paper journal again: don't give up after going through all the main obstacles
You will be surprised how many writers who receive standard "revision and resend" letters never actually do it. But it's worth doing - some writers who are asked to make major revisions endure and eventually publish their work, but others, who have far less to do, never submit again. It seems ridiculous to get past the main hurdles in writing articles, bypassing the editor and returning from peer review only to later give up.
15) It is acceptable to challenge reviewers, with good justification
It is acceptable to reject reviewers' suggestions for changing the components of your article if you have good justification, or can (politely) refute why reviewers are wrong. Rational explanations will be accepted by the editor, especially if it is clear that you have considered all feedback received and received a portion of it.
16) Think about how quickly you want to see your journal published
Some journals rank higher than others so your risk of rejection will be greater. People need to think about whether they need to see their work published quickly - because certain journals will take longer. Some journals, like ours, also access in advance so that after the article is received it appears on the journal's website. This is important if you are preparing for a job interview and need to show that you can be published.
17) Remember: when you read a published journal you only see articles that are finished
Publishing in top journals is a challenge for everyone, but it may seem easier for others. When you read a published journal, you see the finished article, not the first draft, or the first revision and resubmission, or the intermediary version - and you never see the failure.
How to be published in international journals
Journal editors share their suggestions on how to organize a journal, write a cover letter - and handle awkward feedback from reviewers
Writing for international journals is very competitive. Even if you overcome the first obstacle and come up with a valuable idea or research work - how do you then summarize it in a way that will appeal to reviewers?
There is no simple formula to publish - the expectations of editors can vary between and within the field of study. But there are some challenges that all academic writers will face regardless of their discipline. How should you respond to reviewers' feedback? Is there a correct way to arrange paper? And should you always bother to revise and submit again? We ask journal editors from various backgrounds for their tips to be published.
Writing phase
1) Focus on stories that develop logically, not chronologically
Take time before you even write your journal to think about the logic of the presentation. When writing, focus on the story that develops logically, rather than the chronological order of the experiments that you conduct.
2) Don't try to write and edit simultaneously
Open the file on a PC and enter all of your posts and sub-posts and then fill in one of the posts where you have the idea to do it. If you reach your daily target (mine 500 words) write down other ideas as bullet points and stop writing; then use the points to start the next day.
If you write and can't think of the right words (for example for an elephant) don't worry - write (big long nose of an animal) and continue - come back later and get the correct terms. Write not edited; if not, you lose flow.
3) Don't bury your argument like a needle in a haystack
If someone asks you on a bus to explain your journal quickly, can you do it in clear, everyday language? This clear argument will appear in the abstract and the first paragraph (even the first line) of your journal. Don't make us chase down your argument like a needle in a haystack. If hidden on page seven it will only upset us. Oh, and make sure your argument goes along different parts of this journal and brings together theories and empirical material.
4) Ask a colleague to check your work
One of the problems faced by journal editors is poorly written journals. Maybe the first language of the writer is not English and they have not tried hard to proofread it. It might be very difficult to know what is happening in an article if the language and syntax are bad.
5) Published by writing a review or response
Writing a review is a good way to be published - especially for people who are in the early stages of their careers. This is an opportunity to practice writing a work for publication, and get a copy of the book you want for free. We publish more reviews than journals so we continue to look for reviewers (Laraphgirl Journal, 2017)
Several journals, including ours, publish replies to journals that have been published in the same journal. Editors quite like to publish replies to previous journals because it stimulates discussion.
6) Don't forget about international readers
We get people who write from America who think everyone knows the American system - and the same thing happens with British writers. Because we are an international journal, we need writers to enter that international context. You can read more about it at ZAMBRUT.Com.
7) Don't try to cram your PhD into 6,000 words
Sometimes people want to throw everything away at once and achieve many goals. We got people trying to tell us all their PhDs in 6,000 words and it didn't work. More experienced writers will write two or three journals from one project, using certain aspects of their research as a hook.
8) Choose the right journal: that's a bad sign if you don't recognize any editorial boards
Check whether your article is within the scope of the journal you are submitting. This seems very clear but it is surprising how many articles are sent to journals that are totally inappropriate. This is a bad sign if you don't recognize the names of the editorial board members. Ideally, look at a number of current issues to ensure that the article is published on the same topic and has a similar quality and impact.
9) Always follow the correct shipping procedure
Often writers don't spend the 10 minutes needed to read instructions to writers who spend a lot of time on writers and editors and extend the process when there's no need
10) Don't repeat your abstract in the cover letter.
We look to your cover letter for an indication of what you find most interesting and significant about the journal, and why you think it is suitable for the journal. There is no need to repeat the abstract or read the contents of the journal in detail - we will read the journal itself to find out what it says. The cover letter is the place for larger picture outlines, plus any other information you would like us to have.
11) A common reason for rejection is lack of context
Make sure that it is clear where your research is in a broader scientific landscape, and gaps in knowledge are handled. A common reason for articles to be rejected after peer review is lack of context or lack of clarity about why this research is important.
12) Don't mention your methodology too much
Ethnography seems to be a trendy method nowadays, so many articles submitted claim based on that. However, a closer examination revealed very limited and standard interview data. Some interviews in cafes are not ethnographic. Be clear - right from the start - about the nature and scope of your data collection. The same applies to the use of theory. If theoretical insights are useful for your analysis, use them consistently throughout your argument and text.
13) Respond directly (and calmly) to reviewer comments
When resubmitting the journal after a revision, include a detailed document that summarizes all the changes suggested by reviewers, and how you have changed your paper from that perspective. Stick to the facts, and don't shout. Don't respond to reviewers' feedback as soon as you get it. Read it, think about a few days, discuss with others, and then make a response.
14) Revise and submit your paper journal again: don't give up after going through all the main obstacles
You will be surprised how many writers who receive standard "revision and resend" letters never actually do it. But it's worth doing - some writers who are asked to make major revisions endure and eventually publish their work, but others, who have far less to do, never submit again. It seems ridiculous to get past the main hurdles in writing articles, bypassing the editor and returning from peer review only to later give up.
15) It is acceptable to challenge reviewers, with good justification
It is acceptable to reject reviewers' suggestions for changing the components of your article if you have good justification, or can (politely) refute why reviewers are wrong. Rational explanations will be accepted by the editor, especially if it is clear that you have considered all feedback received and received a portion of it.
16) Think about how quickly you want to see your journal published
Some journals rank higher than others so your risk of rejection will be greater. People need to think about whether they need to see their work published quickly - because certain journals will take longer. Some journals, like ours, also access in advance so that after the article is received it appears on the journal's website. This is important if you are preparing for a job interview and need to show that you can be published.
17) Remember: when you read a published journal you only see articles that are finished
Publishing in top journals is a challenge for everyone, but it may seem easier for others. When you read a published journal, you see the finished article, not the first draft, or the first revision and resubmission, or the intermediary version - and you never see the failure.
How to Submit Your Journal Articles?
How to submit your journal articles
How to submit your journal articles
Please send all new articles via the 'Submit article' link to the relevant journal. If you are a new writer, you need to set up an account before submitting your first article. Before submitting your article, please read 'What we are looking for in your article'.
Please ensure that you enter all the necessary information about your article. You will first be asked to choose the type of article for your paper, to enter a title and abstract, and then to choose a few keywords. Please note that, if your article is accepted for publication, we will display this keyword in the published article.
You will then be asked to enter your author information. Please include all authors (if there are less than 10). We recommend that you use the author's full name and ORCID identifier to avoid ambiguity. Note that you can check whether co-authors are already in the journal database by entering the author's email address.
You can also propose references that are liked (and not liked) when submitted. Suggested referees must have appropriate subject expertise and do not have conflicts of interest (please see the ZAMBRUT Journal ethics policy for journals for more information on conflicts of interest). These suggestions will be considered, but the editorial staff and / or Editorial Board will make the final decision regarding the selection of referees.
Any related information that can affect the way paper is handled can be provided in a cover letter. This might include highlighting something very important or important about their research, and information about an earlier version of this paper that is sent to the current journal or to another journal.
You will be asked to provide information about all funders related to your work. It's important that you enter this information because it helps you to meet the requirements of your funders and makes your research easier to find. Please find the Open Funder Registry for your funding agency, and provide the grant number.
You are then required to choose between issuance under a gold open access license or on a subscription basis, to state whether you have reproduced previously published material or not in your shipment, and to confirm that you want the paper you received available. online in 24 hours after receipt.
Finally, before submitting your journal article, you are required to confirm that you have read and understood the IOP ethics policy for the journal, and that your submission complies with the terms.
File upload: to make sending as easy as possible for you, when submitting new articles, we only ask you to upload one PDF file (and any additional relevant data) for your article. The PDF must contain your complete paper, including embedded images and tables. You can upload your article directly from arXiv by entering the arXiv e-print number. Please also submit any permissions that you have obtained at this stage.
If you experience problems submitting your article online, please contact the journal for assistance.
Please note, ZAMBRUT journal does not charge you to submit articles. If there are publication costs to be paid (for open access, color printing, or page fees), this will be explained to you at the time of delivery, and paid at the time of receipt for publication. \
The files that you need to send during the initial shipment are:
1PDF of the complete paper for review (designated 'Complete Document for Review (PDF Only)'), containing the author's name and institution, as well as pictures and tables embedded in the text. Authors are asked to consider the need for clarity and readability when choosing column types, line spacing, font size, and layout when preparing a PDF, to help reviewers.2 All permissions that you have obtained at this stage.3 Complementary data matches (see below for details about the appropriate file).
We encourage you to submit additional data files with your paper. If you send a video file, most standard file formats are suitable: animated GIF, AVI, MPG, etc. However, we strongly recommend that the video file be sent in an MPEG-4 container, which is coded with H264 codec. Other formats are permitted, but using MPEG-4 will give you the most faithful rendering of your videos in HTML journal articles.
Video files must be up to 10MB each. Exceptions can be made in cases where larger files are very important for the science presented.
Zambrut Publishing considers publishing in our journal articles that:
1 Report original knowledge and add significantly to published research
2 Appeals to the community
3 Scientific accuracy
4 Have strong motivation and goals
5 Has never been published before in peer-reviewed literature
6 Not being considered for publication in a journal or other peer review book available through the library or by purchase
7 Comply with our precast pre-publication policies (see below), and8 Comply with our ethical policies.
It's important for you to consider whether you have enough new results before you start planning and writing a journal to submit to Zambrut journals. Reporting additional steps forward from previous work is usually not enough.
Articles based on a thesis for an advanced degree can be submitted. You must take care to ensure that the article is prepared in a research journal format, which is more concise than is appropriate for the thesis.
Articles that report on work that was originally presented at a conference can be submitted, provided these articles do not appear substantially in the same form in the conference process that is reviewed by peers. Again, you must make sure the research journal format is used. The length of the article must also be in accordance with the content. If in doubt, please ask the relevant journal.
Reports that are not available to the general public are not considered by ZAMBRUT as prior publications. Many journals published by ZAMBRUT consider various types of articles in addition to regular research journals, including special edition articles, topical reviews, comments and replies. However, please check through the journal homepage that your article is an acceptable type of article and appropriate scope before submission.
All articles are judged only on their scientific ability. Consideration without consideration is given to all manuscripts offered for publication, regardless of whether the author requests publication based on open gold access and regardless of race, gender, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, political philosophy, sexual orientation, age or author's reputation.
We treat all articles sent as confidential until they are published and will only be shared with referees, board members, editors, and ZAMBRUT staff who are directly involved in the peer review of the article. (An exception to this is if it is necessary to share articles with additional external parties to investigate possible violations of ethical policies.)
You should consider the best way to structure your article before you start writing. If you want to use the LaTeX template to format your paper (this is optional, you don't have to do it) then the files are available in zip format and Unz tar format is gzipped here. Your article must follow the Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion system, and usually consists of the following sections:
Title
The title must be concise, informative, and meaningful for all journal readers. It should include key terms, to help make it easier to find when people search online. Please avoid using long systemic names and abbreviations, acronyms, or symbols that are not standard or unclear.
Author
List of all names and complete institutions of the author. Authors in all ZAMBRUT journals have the option to enter names in Chinese, Japanese or Korean characters in addition to English names. The name will appear in parentheses after the English name. We recommend that you provide an ORCID identifier for all authors to avoid ambiguity. If the author's current address is different from the address where the work was done, this must be explained in the footnotes. Note: this only applies if you submit to a one-blind review journal. If you are sending to a double-blind journal, please do not include the identifying information of the author in your paper.
Keywords
When you submit an article, you will be asked to provide several keywords that are relevant to your work. If your article is accepted for publication, we will display these keywords in published articles, and they will be used to index your articles, helping to make them easier to find. When choosing keywords, think about the types of terms you will use when searching for related articles online.
Abstract
Your abstract should give the reader a brief summary of your article. It should briefly describe the contents of your article, and include key terms (especially in the first two sentences, to improve search engine finding). It must be informative, accessible and not only show the general purpose and scope of the article, but also state the methodology used, the main results obtained and conclusions drawn. The abstract must be complete in itself; It cannot contain unspecified acronyms / abbreviations and no table numbers, image numbers, references or equations that must be referenced. This must be appropriate to be included directly in the abstract service and usually should not be more than 300 words. Some journals ask for abstracts to follow certain structures. Check the instructions for the particular journal to see if you need to submit a structured abstract.
introduction
It should be brief and describe the nature of the problem being investigated and its background. It must also organize your work in the context of previous research, citing relevant references. Introductions should be extended with very specific terms and abbreviations used in the article to make it accessible to readers.
Method
This section must provide sufficient detail from experiments, simulations, statistical tests or analyzes conducted to produce results such that the method can be repeated by other researchers and the results reproduced.
Results
The results section should detail your main findings and research findings. You should use tables only to increase brevity or when information cannot be satisfactorily provided in other ways such as histograms or graphs. Tables must be numbered and referred to in the text with numbers (table 1, etc.). Each table must have an explanation title that must be as level as possible.
Discussion
It should discuss the importance of the results and compare them with previous work using relevant references.
Conclusion
This section should be used to highlight the novelty and significance of the work, and any plans for relevant work in the future.
Thank-you note
All authors and co-authors are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest when submitting articles (eg work, consulting fees, research contracts, share ownership, patent licenses, honorariums, advisory affiliations, etc.). This information must be included in the thank-you section at the end of the paper (before the reference section). All sources of financial support for the project must also be disclosed in the thank-you section. The name of the funding agency and grant number must be given, for example: This work is partly funded by Universitas Negeri Indonesia. When filling out the online submission form, we also ask you to select a funder and provide a grant number to help you meet the requirements of your funder.
How to submit your journal articles
Please send all new articles via the 'Submit article' link to the relevant journal. If you are a new writer, you need to set up an account before submitting your first article. Before submitting your article, please read 'What we are looking for in your article'.
Please ensure that you enter all the necessary information about your article. You will first be asked to choose the type of article for your paper, to enter a title and abstract, and then to choose a few keywords. Please note that, if your article is accepted for publication, we will display this keyword in the published article.
You will then be asked to enter your author information. Please include all authors (if there are less than 10). We recommend that you use the author's full name and ORCID identifier to avoid ambiguity. Note that you can check whether co-authors are already in the journal database by entering the author's email address.
You can also propose references that are liked (and not liked) when submitted. Suggested referees must have appropriate subject expertise and do not have conflicts of interest (please see the ZAMBRUT Journal ethics policy for journals for more information on conflicts of interest). These suggestions will be considered, but the editorial staff and / or Editorial Board will make the final decision regarding the selection of referees.
Any related information that can affect the way paper is handled can be provided in a cover letter. This might include highlighting something very important or important about their research, and information about an earlier version of this paper that is sent to the current journal or to another journal.
You will be asked to provide information about all funders related to your work. It's important that you enter this information because it helps you to meet the requirements of your funders and makes your research easier to find. Please find the Open Funder Registry for your funding agency, and provide the grant number.
You are then required to choose between issuance under a gold open access license or on a subscription basis, to state whether you have reproduced previously published material or not in your shipment, and to confirm that you want the paper you received available. online in 24 hours after receipt.
Finally, before submitting your journal article, you are required to confirm that you have read and understood the IOP ethics policy for the journal, and that your submission complies with the terms.
File upload: to make sending as easy as possible for you, when submitting new articles, we only ask you to upload one PDF file (and any additional relevant data) for your article. The PDF must contain your complete paper, including embedded images and tables. You can upload your article directly from arXiv by entering the arXiv e-print number. Please also submit any permissions that you have obtained at this stage.
If you experience problems submitting your article online, please contact the journal for assistance.
Please note, ZAMBRUT journal does not charge you to submit articles. If there are publication costs to be paid (for open access, color printing, or page fees), this will be explained to you at the time of delivery, and paid at the time of receipt for publication. \
The files that you need to send during the initial shipment are:
1PDF of the complete paper for review (designated 'Complete Document for Review (PDF Only)'), containing the author's name and institution, as well as pictures and tables embedded in the text. Authors are asked to consider the need for clarity and readability when choosing column types, line spacing, font size, and layout when preparing a PDF, to help reviewers.2 All permissions that you have obtained at this stage.3 Complementary data matches (see below for details about the appropriate file).
We encourage you to submit additional data files with your paper. If you send a video file, most standard file formats are suitable: animated GIF, AVI, MPG, etc. However, we strongly recommend that the video file be sent in an MPEG-4 container, which is coded with H264 codec. Other formats are permitted, but using MPEG-4 will give you the most faithful rendering of your videos in HTML journal articles.
Video files must be up to 10MB each. Exceptions can be made in cases where larger files are very important for the science presented.
Zambrut Publishing considers publishing in our journal articles that:
1 Report original knowledge and add significantly to published research
2 Appeals to the community
3 Scientific accuracy
4 Have strong motivation and goals
5 Has never been published before in peer-reviewed literature
6 Not being considered for publication in a journal or other peer review book available through the library or by purchase
7 Comply with our precast pre-publication policies (see below), and8 Comply with our ethical policies.
It's important for you to consider whether you have enough new results before you start planning and writing a journal to submit to Zambrut journals. Reporting additional steps forward from previous work is usually not enough.
Articles based on a thesis for an advanced degree can be submitted. You must take care to ensure that the article is prepared in a research journal format, which is more concise than is appropriate for the thesis.
Articles that report on work that was originally presented at a conference can be submitted, provided these articles do not appear substantially in the same form in the conference process that is reviewed by peers. Again, you must make sure the research journal format is used. The length of the article must also be in accordance with the content. If in doubt, please ask the relevant journal.
Reports that are not available to the general public are not considered by ZAMBRUT as prior publications. Many journals published by ZAMBRUT consider various types of articles in addition to regular research journals, including special edition articles, topical reviews, comments and replies. However, please check through the journal homepage that your article is an acceptable type of article and appropriate scope before submission.
All articles are judged only on their scientific ability. Consideration without consideration is given to all manuscripts offered for publication, regardless of whether the author requests publication based on open gold access and regardless of race, gender, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, political philosophy, sexual orientation, age or author's reputation.
We treat all articles sent as confidential until they are published and will only be shared with referees, board members, editors, and ZAMBRUT staff who are directly involved in the peer review of the article. (An exception to this is if it is necessary to share articles with additional external parties to investigate possible violations of ethical policies.)
You should consider the best way to structure your article before you start writing. If you want to use the LaTeX template to format your paper (this is optional, you don't have to do it) then the files are available in zip format and Unz tar format is gzipped here. Your article must follow the Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion system, and usually consists of the following sections:
Title
The title must be concise, informative, and meaningful for all journal readers. It should include key terms, to help make it easier to find when people search online. Please avoid using long systemic names and abbreviations, acronyms, or symbols that are not standard or unclear.
Author
List of all names and complete institutions of the author. Authors in all ZAMBRUT journals have the option to enter names in Chinese, Japanese or Korean characters in addition to English names. The name will appear in parentheses after the English name. We recommend that you provide an ORCID identifier for all authors to avoid ambiguity. If the author's current address is different from the address where the work was done, this must be explained in the footnotes. Note: this only applies if you submit to a one-blind review journal. If you are sending to a double-blind journal, please do not include the identifying information of the author in your paper.
Keywords
When you submit an article, you will be asked to provide several keywords that are relevant to your work. If your article is accepted for publication, we will display these keywords in published articles, and they will be used to index your articles, helping to make them easier to find. When choosing keywords, think about the types of terms you will use when searching for related articles online.
Abstract
Your abstract should give the reader a brief summary of your article. It should briefly describe the contents of your article, and include key terms (especially in the first two sentences, to improve search engine finding). It must be informative, accessible and not only show the general purpose and scope of the article, but also state the methodology used, the main results obtained and conclusions drawn. The abstract must be complete in itself; It cannot contain unspecified acronyms / abbreviations and no table numbers, image numbers, references or equations that must be referenced. This must be appropriate to be included directly in the abstract service and usually should not be more than 300 words. Some journals ask for abstracts to follow certain structures. Check the instructions for the particular journal to see if you need to submit a structured abstract.
introduction
It should be brief and describe the nature of the problem being investigated and its background. It must also organize your work in the context of previous research, citing relevant references. Introductions should be extended with very specific terms and abbreviations used in the article to make it accessible to readers.
Method
This section must provide sufficient detail from experiments, simulations, statistical tests or analyzes conducted to produce results such that the method can be repeated by other researchers and the results reproduced.
Results
The results section should detail your main findings and research findings. You should use tables only to increase brevity or when information cannot be satisfactorily provided in other ways such as histograms or graphs. Tables must be numbered and referred to in the text with numbers (table 1, etc.). Each table must have an explanation title that must be as level as possible.
Discussion
It should discuss the importance of the results and compare them with previous work using relevant references.
Conclusion
This section should be used to highlight the novelty and significance of the work, and any plans for relevant work in the future.
Thank-you note
All authors and co-authors are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest when submitting articles (eg work, consulting fees, research contracts, share ownership, patent licenses, honorariums, advisory affiliations, etc.). This information must be included in the thank-you section at the end of the paper (before the reference section). All sources of financial support for the project must also be disclosed in the thank-you section. The name of the funding agency and grant number must be given, for example: This work is partly funded by Universitas Negeri Indonesia. When filling out the online submission form, we also ask you to select a funder and provide a grant number to help you meet the requirements of your funder.
How to Publish a Research Journal?
How to Publish a Research Journal?
How to Publish a Research Journal
Publishing research journals in peer-reviewed journals is an important activity in the academic community. This allows you to network with other scholars, put your name and work into circulation, and further refine your ideas and research. Publishing isn't easy, but you can increase your chances by submitting research that is technically good and creative but straightforward. It is also important to find an academic journal that is suitable for your topic and writing style, so that you can adapt your research journal to it and increase your chances for wider publication and recognition.
Submit International Journals Papers (and Resend) Your Paper
Ask a colleague or professor to review your research journal. They must edit your paper for grammar, spelling mistakes, typos, clarity, and conciseness. They must also verify your content. Research journals need to present significant and relevant problems. They must be clearly written, easy to follow, and appropriate for the intended audience. [1]
Ask two or three people to review your journal. At least one person must be a non-expert on the main topic - their "outsider's perspective" can be very valuable, because not all reviewers will become experts in your specific topic.
Revise your journal based on the recommendations of your reviewers. Chances are you will go through several concepts before the final submission of your research journal. Give special effort to make your paper clear, attractive, and easy to follow. This will greatly increase your chances of being published. [2]
Prepare your paper according to the journal requirements you choose. Format your research journal so that it follows the guidelines for that publication. Most journals provide a document called "Instructions to Authors" or "Journal Writing Guides" that offer specific instructions on layout, typeface, and length. This guide will also tell you how to submit your journal and will provide details of the review process. [3]
Journal articles in science often follow certain organizational formats, such as: Abstract; Introduction; Method; Results; Discussion; Conclusion; Acknowledgments / References. People in the arts and humanities are usually less organized.
Submit your article when you feel ready. Open the Author's Guide (or something similar) on the journal's website to review the submission requirements. Once you are satisfied that your paper meets all of the guidelines, send the paper through the appropriate channels. Some journals allow online submission, while others prefer printed copies. [4]
Submit your article to only one journal at a time. Go down your list, one at a time, as needed.
When submitting online, use your university email account. This connects you to scientific institutions, which add credibility to your work.
Don't panic when you get an initial journal response. Very few article submissions have received "Receive" direct from peer-reviewed journals. If you get one of them, go celebrate! If not, calmly deal with the reply you get. This may be one of the following: [5]
Accept with Revisions - only minor adjustments are needed, based on feedback provided by reviewers.
Revision and Resubmission - more substantial changes (as described) are needed before publication can be considered, but the journal is still very interested in your work.
Decline and Resubmit - this article is currently not worth considering, but major changes and refocusing might change this result.
Decline - this journal does not and will not be suitable for this publication, but that does not mean it might not work for other journals.
Embrace reviewer comments as constructive criticism. Quite often, you will be asked to revise your journal and resubmit it, based on comments provided by several (often three) anonymous reviewers and editors. Study their criticisms carefully and make the necessary changes.
Don't be too attached to your original shipment. Instead, remain flexible and reload the paper according to the feedback you receive. Use your expertise as a researcher and writer to create a superior journal.
However, you don't need to "roll over" and gently follow the comments of reviewers who you think are off target. Open a dialogue with the editor and explain your position, respectfully but confidently. Remember, you are an expert in this particular topic! [6]
Keep trying to publish your journal. Even if you are ultimately rejected by the journal of your choice, continue to rewrite your research journal and submit it to other publications. [7]
Remember, rejected paper is not always the same as bad paper. Many factors, many of which are completely out of your control, go into determining which articles are accepted.
Move to your second choice journal for submission. You can even ask for guidance on finding better matches from the first journal editor.
Choosing the Right Journal to Receive
Familiarize yourself with potential publications. Be aware of published research and current questions and studies in your field. Pay special attention to how other research journals in your field are written: format, type of article (quantitative versus qualitative studies, primary research, existing journal reviews), writing style, subject matter, and vocabulary. [8]
Read international journals related to your field of study.
Search online for published research journals, conference journals, and journal articles.
Ask a colleague or professor for a list of suggested readings.
Choose the publication that best fits your research journal. Each publication has its own audience and writing tone. Determine, for example, whether your research journal would be more suitable in a highly technical journal and is only intended for other scholars, or a journal that is more general for a wider audience. [9]
"Fit" is very important here - the most famous journal in your field may not be the most suitable for your specific job. However, at the same time, don't sell yourself assuming your paper will never be good enough for the top shelf publication.
Remember circulation or journal exposure in mind. After narrowing down the list of potential submission sites, do a little digging to find out how many articles were read and quoted in these journals. A greater exposure to your work will be a definite benefit, especially when you try to make a name for yourself early in your career. [10]
However, always prioritize journals reviewed by peers - where field scholars review works submitted anonymously. This is the basic standard for scientific publishing.
You can increase your readership dramatically by publishing open access journals. As such, this will be freely available as part of an online peer-reviewed scientific journal repository. [11]
Strengthen Your Submission
Give your paper a clear vision. A good journal article usually gets to the point and stays along the way. Determine what your paper actually explored / investigated / completed from the beginning, and make sure that each subsequent paragraph is based on this vision. [12]
Make a strong and clear statement about this vision in your thesis statement. Compare the following weak vs. strong statement:
"This journal explores how George Washington's experience as a young officer might have shaped his views during difficult circumstances as a commander."
"This journal argues that George Washington's experience as a young officer on the Pennsylvania border in the 1750s directly affected his relationship with Continental Army troops during the harsh winter in Valley Forge."
Narrow your focus. A clear vision can also be a big vision, but journal articles are not suitable for a thorough examination of large-scale topics. Scholars who revise the content of a thesis or dissertation often struggle with this element; You should be able to remove (or at least return significantly) things such as background information, literature reviews, and methodological discussions for journal articles. [13]
This is especially true for young scholars who enter this field. Leave great exploration (but still only 20-30 pages) for more established scholars.
Write upper class abstracts. Abstraction is the first impression a reviewer will get from your work, so you have to make it count. Make sure there are absolutely no typos or unnecessary elements; You will only have around 300 words to work on. Be bold in your claims and original in your approach, but don't over-sell what your articles actually provide. [14]
Abstract You must get people excited to start reading articles, but never be disappointed when they finish an article.
Get as many people as possible to read your abstract and provide feedback before you submit your journal to the journal
How to Publish a Research Journal
Publishing research journals in peer-reviewed journals is an important activity in the academic community. This allows you to network with other scholars, put your name and work into circulation, and further refine your ideas and research. Publishing isn't easy, but you can increase your chances by submitting research that is technically good and creative but straightforward. It is also important to find an academic journal that is suitable for your topic and writing style, so that you can adapt your research journal to it and increase your chances for wider publication and recognition.
Submit International Journals Papers (and Resend) Your Paper
Ask a colleague or professor to review your research journal. They must edit your paper for grammar, spelling mistakes, typos, clarity, and conciseness. They must also verify your content. Research journals need to present significant and relevant problems. They must be clearly written, easy to follow, and appropriate for the intended audience. [1]
Ask two or three people to review your journal. At least one person must be a non-expert on the main topic - their "outsider's perspective" can be very valuable, because not all reviewers will become experts in your specific topic.
Revise your journal based on the recommendations of your reviewers. Chances are you will go through several concepts before the final submission of your research journal. Give special effort to make your paper clear, attractive, and easy to follow. This will greatly increase your chances of being published. [2]
Prepare your paper according to the journal requirements you choose. Format your research journal so that it follows the guidelines for that publication. Most journals provide a document called "Instructions to Authors" or "Journal Writing Guides" that offer specific instructions on layout, typeface, and length. This guide will also tell you how to submit your journal and will provide details of the review process. [3]
Journal articles in science often follow certain organizational formats, such as: Abstract; Introduction; Method; Results; Discussion; Conclusion; Acknowledgments / References. People in the arts and humanities are usually less organized.
Submit your article when you feel ready. Open the Author's Guide (or something similar) on the journal's website to review the submission requirements. Once you are satisfied that your paper meets all of the guidelines, send the paper through the appropriate channels. Some journals allow online submission, while others prefer printed copies. [4]
Submit your article to only one journal at a time. Go down your list, one at a time, as needed.
When submitting online, use your university email account. This connects you to scientific institutions, which add credibility to your work.
Don't panic when you get an initial journal response. Very few article submissions have received "Receive" direct from peer-reviewed journals. If you get one of them, go celebrate! If not, calmly deal with the reply you get. This may be one of the following: [5]
Accept with Revisions - only minor adjustments are needed, based on feedback provided by reviewers.
Revision and Resubmission - more substantial changes (as described) are needed before publication can be considered, but the journal is still very interested in your work.
Decline and Resubmit - this article is currently not worth considering, but major changes and refocusing might change this result.
Decline - this journal does not and will not be suitable for this publication, but that does not mean it might not work for other journals.
Embrace reviewer comments as constructive criticism. Quite often, you will be asked to revise your journal and resubmit it, based on comments provided by several (often three) anonymous reviewers and editors. Study their criticisms carefully and make the necessary changes.
Don't be too attached to your original shipment. Instead, remain flexible and reload the paper according to the feedback you receive. Use your expertise as a researcher and writer to create a superior journal.
However, you don't need to "roll over" and gently follow the comments of reviewers who you think are off target. Open a dialogue with the editor and explain your position, respectfully but confidently. Remember, you are an expert in this particular topic! [6]
Keep trying to publish your journal. Even if you are ultimately rejected by the journal of your choice, continue to rewrite your research journal and submit it to other publications. [7]
Remember, rejected paper is not always the same as bad paper. Many factors, many of which are completely out of your control, go into determining which articles are accepted.
Move to your second choice journal for submission. You can even ask for guidance on finding better matches from the first journal editor.
Choosing the Right Journal to Receive
Familiarize yourself with potential publications. Be aware of published research and current questions and studies in your field. Pay special attention to how other research journals in your field are written: format, type of article (quantitative versus qualitative studies, primary research, existing journal reviews), writing style, subject matter, and vocabulary. [8]
Read international journals related to your field of study.
Search online for published research journals, conference journals, and journal articles.
Ask a colleague or professor for a list of suggested readings.
Choose the publication that best fits your research journal. Each publication has its own audience and writing tone. Determine, for example, whether your research journal would be more suitable in a highly technical journal and is only intended for other scholars, or a journal that is more general for a wider audience. [9]
"Fit" is very important here - the most famous journal in your field may not be the most suitable for your specific job. However, at the same time, don't sell yourself assuming your paper will never be good enough for the top shelf publication.
Remember circulation or journal exposure in mind. After narrowing down the list of potential submission sites, do a little digging to find out how many articles were read and quoted in these journals. A greater exposure to your work will be a definite benefit, especially when you try to make a name for yourself early in your career. [10]
However, always prioritize journals reviewed by peers - where field scholars review works submitted anonymously. This is the basic standard for scientific publishing.
You can increase your readership dramatically by publishing open access journals. As such, this will be freely available as part of an online peer-reviewed scientific journal repository. [11]
Strengthen Your Submission
Give your paper a clear vision. A good journal article usually gets to the point and stays along the way. Determine what your paper actually explored / investigated / completed from the beginning, and make sure that each subsequent paragraph is based on this vision. [12]
Make a strong and clear statement about this vision in your thesis statement. Compare the following weak vs. strong statement:
"This journal explores how George Washington's experience as a young officer might have shaped his views during difficult circumstances as a commander."
"This journal argues that George Washington's experience as a young officer on the Pennsylvania border in the 1750s directly affected his relationship with Continental Army troops during the harsh winter in Valley Forge."
Narrow your focus. A clear vision can also be a big vision, but journal articles are not suitable for a thorough examination of large-scale topics. Scholars who revise the content of a thesis or dissertation often struggle with this element; You should be able to remove (or at least return significantly) things such as background information, literature reviews, and methodological discussions for journal articles. [13]
This is especially true for young scholars who enter this field. Leave great exploration (but still only 20-30 pages) for more established scholars.
Write upper class abstracts. Abstraction is the first impression a reviewer will get from your work, so you have to make it count. Make sure there are absolutely no typos or unnecessary elements; You will only have around 300 words to work on. Be bold in your claims and original in your approach, but don't over-sell what your articles actually provide. [14]
Abstract You must get people excited to start reading articles, but never be disappointed when they finish an article.
Get as many people as possible to read your abstract and provide feedback before you submit your journal to the journal
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)